Wednesday, January 26, 2005

With Freedom & Liberty for ALL the World
Since we invaded Iraq, and the reason for the War was changed, the stated Foriegn Policy of the United States of America has become very different than it has ever been in the past. The new policy is simple "As the dominant political and financial player in the world, we will stand by and assist all people, in all nations to be like the U.S., by spreading freedom & democracy to all nations". The President has made the case that by doing so, and standing by any and all oppressed people around the world, that we will be safer and freer at home, and the world will be a safer and freer place to live.
Personally, while I am all for freedom and democracy, I am not really sure that I want the job or the responsibility to see to it that all people all over the world are free from tyranny and oppression. And, I am not sure that the rest of the world wants to be like the U.S. or live the way we do. And, who exactly are we to think that we can or should dictate to the rest of the world how they should live.
I think we lose sight of the fact that the U.S., while an important and powerful player in the world, we are very small and are far from the majority...by any measure except dollars. Our population of about 300,000,000 is a mere few 5% of the global population. Our Judeo-Christian belief system is the minority when compared to Islam and Muslim populations. Our lifestyle and social beliefs are shunned by most of the world population as frivilous and irresponsible and way to liberal...bordering on hedonism.
Now, I am all for our way of living...its the way I live. Yes I could be more religious, watch less TV, read more, and spend more time with my family, but I like my lifstyle. I don't think I am bothering anybody so, don't bother me. As for other societies and people around the world, I bet they feel the same about the way they live. And, while I am sure they would want the U.S. military to come along and dethrone their tyrant, rebuild their countries with all the latest 21 century comforts & technology, I am even more sure that they do not want any part of our lifestyle or democratic ways. They would welcome us with open arms and escort us to the door with beheadings & suicide bombs.

DIFFERENT THIS TIME...I think not
I can't help but notice the fact that the stock market and its forecasters are in clear violation of some very long standing and very accurate 'rules' of wall street.

First and foremost, "Don't fight the FED". When the FED is in a tightening mode, which it seems to be in currently, the rule states that the market will most certainly 'stumble' upon the third hike in rates. To date we have had 5 rate hikes and a 6th is highly predicted for next week. Whether from very low levels or not, interest rates are being raised, and will continue to be unless the FED's optimism about the economy changes for the worse. In addition, with the benign inflation forecasts, and continued productivity advances, the FED seems to have nothing to stop it from continuing on its prescribed path of "measured" rate increases. Most market strategists are calling the recent sell-off a "buying opportunity" in a continued economic expansion.

Second, "sustained high oil prices are followed by recessions". With oil near $50/barrel and many energy experts forecasting sustained high oil prices, we have what would normally be called an "oil shock". While some have called it that, most of the official government comments and statements from FED officials have played down the sustained rise in oil prices. Many argue that the price of oil on an inflation adjusted basis is still well below that of the price in the early 1970's when we had our last serious oil crisis. That argument may make them feel better and may calm some fears of potentially higher prices, but the facts are less sanguine. With oil prices at current levels, the price is some 50% higher than it was just 1 year ago. Whether inflation adjusted or not, that is a sharp rise and will change the budgets of many consumers and businesses. Oil prices have far reaching effects and rapid and sustained rises will almost certainly cause cost issues for many parts of the economy.

Either one of these factors, rising interest rates or high energy prices, alone would be bad for any economy. The combination could be even worse. Yet, the US economy isn't just any economy, especially of late. Over the past 3 years, low interest rates, which encouraged enormous debt creation, have been the lynch pin for the recent economic recovery, including the dramatic rise in real estate values and the huge cash extraction from that real estate. In addition, low interest financing has allowed automobile manufacturers to flood the market with SUV's that are less than fuel efficient, thus adding to the demand picture for oil.
The War in Iraq and fear of imminent terror attacks lay the back drop for a future of uncertainty and risk unprecedented in recent history. Our economy is not yet growing on a self sustaining and predictable path so the above mentioned economic issues are even more important than in the past.
The flagrant disregard for what has happened in the past when either interest rates are on the rise or a sustained rise in energy prices is maintained, seems unwise. Add to this the uncertainty of a terror attack, the War in Iraq, and our countrys' current fiscal irresponsibility with regards to the twin deficits, and who knows how bad it could really get. My guess is pretty bad.

Tuesday, January 25, 2005

SOCIAL WHAT?
The latest political issue du jour is how to reform the Social Security system. What is interesting about this issue is what will be done to salvage an inadequate and misguided system put in place by the government under the guise that it will in some way secure our golden years. What exactly needs to be done is still unclear, and why it needs to be done is not understood. The fascinating part of the debate is seeing which politicians support the various reform proposals and trying to figure out their political motivations. What may become the most important aspect of the entire debate, is that in every survey most Americans do not want to pay into the system and most do not believe that the Social Security system will be around when its there time to receive benefits.
The name Social Security is itself a misnomer. The system itself is not secure, and it does not provide any financial security. Today, the system is such that 3 workers are paying in benefits for every 1 recipient. That ratio will be down to 2 for 1 in the next 10 years. When the system was established, 30 workers contributed for 1 retirees benefits. Clearly the system is broken.
The government estimates that in the next 15-50 years the system will bankrupt if serious changes aren't made. Either raising the retirement age, lowering benefits or raising contributions...none of which are 'politically' tolerable, must be done in order to rescue the system. Republicans have different goals then Democrats, yet most people in the country do not understand why. If the Social Security is supposed to be the retirement system of last resort, make the changes that need to be made and fix the system.
As a middle aged American worker, I can tell you that I do not in any way, shape, or form plan on living off my Social Security benefits. Not only won't my benefits be enough to allow me to spend the way I hope to be able to or to live the lifestyle I hope to be fortunate to live, they probably won't be enough to pay for my medications that I will surely need as I live to be 80 plus years old...please G-d. If was planning on relying on Social Security benefits, my expectations would be to live a substandard lifestyle just skirting the poverty level.
Social Security is designed to be a paid-in welfare system, thus allowing the retired elderly a stipend of payments that takes the place of welfare from the government. Social Security is not going to allow the baby boom generation or any subsequent generations anywhere near enough money to live the way they want or are used to, so why bother struggling to fix the system. Aloow it to run out and stop colloecting the payroll tax for it. That would allow workers to get more of what they earn today and would force them to plan for their own retirement and be responsible about how they will live when they retire.
Allowing the system to stay in place with the false sense that it will take care of people when they retire is a sham, and will not help now or when todays workers retire. All good things must come to an end, and Social Security is a broken system that should be allowed to end...most won't miss it a bit.

Monday, January 10, 2005

The More Things Change The More They Remain The Same
and the longer the market ignores the facts the larger the fall will be
I am still "bearish" on the equity markets and the actual economic health of the US economy. Just because nothing bad has happened does not reduce the risk that it will. The fact that the market has rallied does not negate the fact that it still can go down and investors can lose capital. Risk is still high and reward is based on the "greater fool" theory more than ever before.
So, I am ringing in the New Year with some Things I Think Will Happen...and again I state that just because I have written some of this before and to date it has been less than correct, does not mean it will not be correct going forward.

HIGHLIGHTS include...

1)Auto Bubble will burst
2)Higher interest rates will matter...especially to the impervious Housing market
3)Refinance activity will slow dramatically...consumers will run dry
4)Consumers will run out of money/credit
5)Metals will resume bull market and reach new highs...Gold $500+
6)Fannie Mae will blowup
7)Energy prices will reach new highs...Oil $60+
8)Apple's Ipod will become latest over-hyped gadget
9)War in Iraq will spin "totally out of control"...US troops will be hit with catastrophic casualties
10)Market indices will give back last 2 years of gains and then some...
Dow-16%(<8,900)/s&p>-18%(<971)/nasdaq-25%(<1,600)
1)The rubber will finally hit the road for the automobile manufacturers as well as automobile retailers and auto part suppliers. During a historically difficult economic growth enviroment, automobile manufacturers have "magically" induced the American public to "buy" their new vehicles at a pace which just a few years ago was thought to be impossible. The problem with the sales activity, is that many, if not most, of the sales were encouraged and facilitated through financing that left much of the risk on the sellers balance sheet. The manufacturers basically allowed consumers to take the cars for "little or no money down", in some cases with no payments for 3-6 months, and accepted very favorable financing terms (for the buyers) and extracted no collateral to do so. In addition, the manufacturers continued to produce vehicles at a pace that could not avoid creating a glut of new cars that last longer and have better warranty terms than previous production ramps ups. This has created a situation where we now have the "youngest" and potentially longest "life span" vehicles on the road than ever before. Used car values have dropped substantially, and in the next few years many consumers will own their vehicles "free and clear" and will have little or no incentive to buy a new vehicle as the value of the used vehicle will be much less than the value the vehicle provides to keep it...i.e. use as first car for child, "station car", vehicle for older parent, etc. The real "bogey man" for the automobile manufacturers may come in the form of credit defaults. During this period of peak sales, the sales have become harder and harder to come by, and the sellers have become more and more lienient with credit approvals in order to keep up the sales pace. Those 2 factors were a terrible combination for Sears a few years ago, and I forsee a similar problem for the lending arms of the major automobile manufacturers. Finally, as sales slow, the earnings from the financing divisions will drop. While the sales trends have been artificially propped up by incentives and creative financing deals the bulk of the auto manufacturers earnings over the past 3 years have come from the financing of the vehicles, to the tune of some 50-75% of profits came from the financing divisions of Ford and General Motors. Slower sales will necessitate difficult production cuts that could last for 12-24 months. The combination of production cuts, lower earnings from the financing arms, and higher credit defaults could produce a very difficult economic reality for the automobile industry.


2)Higher Interest rates will matter and will have a negative impact on many consumer areas but most significantly on the over-heated HOUSING market. The marginal buyer that was given the gift of low interest rates, easy lending enviroment, and lax appraisal process for the last 3 years will now encounter the reality that a home purchase is "the biggest and most important purchase of your life". Carry costs will become unmanageable, ARM's will adjust upwardly raising mortgage payments, and any economic difficulty or career disruption will result in a very bad problem. For new buyers, the mortgage application/approval process along with the valuation/appraisal process will become more stringent and less forgiving. Refinance activity that has helped to support homeowners with carry costs, upkeep, and home improvements will slow due to higher rates and more stable or falling home values. Homeowners will struggle to deal with higher rates on adjustable rate mortages (ARM's) and will find it difficult to extract any new cash from their homes. Low interest rates that fueled strong sales of new and existing homes will be a distant memory and further increase in home sales and prices will become harder and harder to achieve. Homebuilders that have continued to forecast unabbated sales growth and have built inventory of spec homes and acquired land for future building will find a more difficult pricing enviroment and a less than able consumer to sell to. Oh yeah...remember the one about "3 hikes and a stumble" and "don't fight the FED"... well how about "5 hikes and a wipeout" and "don't forget that stocks usually go down when rates go up"?!


3)Refinance activity will slow dramatically. This will happen due to higher interest rates and a slowdown in the appreciation of real estate values. Other factors will converge to reverse a huge increase in lending activity which occurred due in part to lower rates and in part to large increases in values of real estate over the past few years. The combination of those 2 factors along with higher demand, creative financing, easy credit process, and lax appraisal processes allowed for a huge "extraction" of capital from hard assets which was subsequently "spent" by consumers to maintain their living standards. These trends are likely to reverse, and credits will be strained. Lenders including banks, credit card companies, mortgage lenders, automobile lenders(i.e. F, GM, GE, etc.), store branded credit card lenders, furniture lenders, will all experience a decline in credit worthiness of borrowers/buyers and that will undoubtedly lead to a rise in credit defaults as well as lowers sales volume due to fewer qualified borrowers/buyers. Prime and sub-prime lenders will be hit with a "double whammy" type impact in the form of lower sales/transactions/servicing fees and higher default rates which will lead to large writeoffs. A 3rd impact will be higher expenses as they will have too many employees and overhead to handle the lower levels of business volume. Clearly the sub-prime lenders like NEW New Century Financial and NFI Novastar Financial would suffer severly from a slowdown in mortgage lending activity and an increase in default rates on loans to the somewhat less than credit worthy borrowers. Others that will experience this "pain" could include companies that have benefitted greatly from the mortgage refinance boom of the last few years including HRB H & R Block, F Ford, GM, General Motors, GE General Electric, some homebuilders, especially those catering to 1st time buyers...including CTX Centex, LEN Lennar, RYL Ryland Group, & BZH Beazer Homes, and any other large company that arranged for "seller financing" type deals with consumers in order to help facilitate demand for their products that without financing would not have been there.



4)The US consumer will finally run out of money/credit and retail sales will slow significantly. Consumer retail darlings will suffer sales declines and will be forced to close rather than open new store locations. Clothing, furniture, auto, electronic, jewelry, and home improvement companies will all experience this slowdown. ANF Abercrombie & Finch, BBY BestBuy, CC Circuit City, RSH RadioShack, FD Fedeated Department Stores, SKS Saks, KSS Kohl's, MIK Michael Stores, HD Home Depot, AEOS American Eagle Outfitters, ARO Aeropostle, PSUN Pacific Sunwear, ZLC Zales, TIF Tiffany, AN AutoNation, KMX CarMax, HDI Harley Davidson, POOL SC Pool, PII Polaris Industries, FBN Furniture Brands, ETH Ethan Allen, HVT Haverty Furniture, etc, etc. Any retailer that relies on easy credit and/or a frivolous consumer will face challenges in 2005. Beneficiaries would include TGT Target, WMT WalMart, COST CostCo, DELL Dell Computer, ROST Ross Stores, BBBY Bed bath & Beyond, and others that provide consumers with selection of necessary daily items and a value proposition for discretionary purchases.



5)GOLD ($500)and other metals such as silver, platinum, copper, aluminum, etc. will reach new highs as the US$ continues to erode and demand from China continues. The US$ will reach 1.43EURO and will break 1.00yen. Implications are hard to predict, yet it seems pretty clear that foriegners may limit or stop investing in $US priced asstes and may limit or stop lending money to the US Government, thus hurting spending and causing rates to rise...possibly dramatically. Metals' price increase will hurt manufacturing of various products and cause renewed interest in storing capital in "hard assets" such as Gold and Silver. Any type of serious geopolitical "upset", i.e. major terrorist attack, would also cause a surge in the price of Gold.



6)Fannie Mae will falter and create a significant credit crisis for the mortgage market. The SEC, Justice Department, NYSE, and governmental scrutiny will all prove to be "too little too late" for equity shareholders and for some bond holders, as shortfalls in capital and internal controls will be uncovered, revealed, and will pose a meaningful systematic risk for the overall market. My guess is that the newly placed CEO and management of the company will blame the highly computerized qualification process, new computerized credit scoring systems and approval processes, and lack of internal controls at lower levels for the foul ups. Outgoing CEO Raines will plead "not guilty" to anything he will be charged with and will lay blame on his underlings for not doing their jobs properly. The Federal government will in some way "come to the rescue" of this "too big to fail" entity, for the greater good, but the shareholders equity will be greatly diminished &/or wipped out in the process. short FNM.



7)Energy prices will resume the uptrend and will reach new highs at the levels that many analysts and economists say will create an OIL CRISIS ($84). I think there is a 50/50 chance of a supply disruption caused by terrorism, natural disaster, or OPEC "problems", which would not only cause prices to rise dramatically, but would cause other problems for the economy as well. Many industries that rely on Oil or energy to make their products will suffer margin compression as costs rise and competition will pressure selling prices.



8)The Ipod will prove to be the latest example of a great idea/gadget that "flashes" in the pan. Even as the "gift of the year" this past holiday season, I believe that competition and new product offerings will prove too much for the Ipod to handle. Sales of the popular and colorful MP3 player will flag and will not create new interest in the Apple computer hardware or Macintosh operating system. Recent history is full of what I call "cool but worthless" products. The most recent example is the Palm Pilot, which continues to be a great product and very useful, yet once it was mass produced by every electronic manufacturer and the prices fell while inventories increased, the future profitability disappeared. Another "cool but useless" gadget is the picture phone, which is fun and cool for the first month the consumer has it, but thereafter is just a novelty that is rarely used by the cell phone customer and will not provide a premium price for the cell phone manufacturers to add into phones...i.e it will be given away to induce additional sales and to be competitive. The Ipod is the latest example of a glorified gadget. It is no more than a "fancy" MP3 player that does way too much, holds way too much, and costs way too much. Many formidable competitors have entered the fray to sell MP3 gadgets to the insatiable American consumer, and the result will likely be a similar demise in prices and profitability as the Palm Pilot and picture phone suffered, as well as a decline in Ipod demand. Short AAPL.


9)The War in Iraq, being sold to the American public as an important front on the War on Terror will spin totally out of control. The Coalition forces, aka US Troops, will endure more casualties and deaths than in the previous years. I predict that American troops will be hit with a "catastrophic" attack resulting in the loss of hundreds of soldiers. (I do not wish for this to occur and I loathe the thought, but I do think it is a real possibility.) An attack similar to the Beirut Barracks Bombing that was the beginning of the US exit from Lebennon. If this does happen, the American public will revolt against the war in Iraq, and the President and his administration will be foced to withdraw troops and turn over Iraq to Iraqi control. I also think that there is a 50/50 chance of a terror attack in the US which would result in a renewed sense of fear in the general public and a lack of confidence in the governments efforts to protect the US from terror, despite all the money spent and the efforts put forth to do so.


10)The above confluence of events will result in a very bad trading environment for US equities and will create an enviroment where investors will continuously be disappointed with geopolitical events. Bad news will dominate the headlines and news crawls. Business and economic news will suffer. Business leaders will retrench again and will resist hiring new workers and will cut back on capital spending until a more stable world is evidence. This will result in lower equity prices and I think the major indexes will give back all of the gains of the last 2 years.
Dow-16%(<8,900)/s&p> -18%(<971)/nasdaq-25%(<1,600)
I continue to beleive that we are in a longterm period of economic decline. I see the last few years, since 2000, and the next few years, till say 2008-2010, as the 2nd Great Depression for the majority of the US population...especially the rapidily growing middle and lower class. The upper class wealthy American people have been helped famously by the Federal Government and lopsided pay models of Corporate America. As with most things, financial well-being and economic prosperity are "relative" and relative to past economic periods, the current state of our economy and the future economic outlook is at best "relatively" dismal. The media is fortunate in that it can focus on the positive and "pretty" things up so that the masses don't get to worried or upset. The media helps most to believe that "good times" are upon us or that its only a matter of time before it will be. The reality is much less sanguine and as the baby boom generation heads for a very difficult and protracted period of retirement and old age. Economic malaise will be what most boomers experience. Unfortunately for the baby boomers, the government and the next generation; their children and grand children, are totally unprepared, and unwilling to take care of them, and they are in no way prepared to take care of themselves. As the "greatest generation" lives longer than any of its ancestors, the economic reality of huge healthcare costs, lack of employment opportunity, lack of savings, and high costs of living will create a very difficult period of time for this huge swath of the population during their "golden years".
Stephen Roach, the well known global strategist, economist, and resident Bear at Morgan Stanley recently wrote a piece regarding the risks that abound in the equity markets. Here is a link to check it out for yourselves. Ignore this at your own risk.